|
|
|
|
Today the word stove
conjures up the large blocky industrially-made appliance that sits in the
kitchen and produces heat fairly automatically. It cooks and bakes with an
increasingly interesting array of fuels. It is almost universally owned and
found in just about every American kitchen, is a nuisance to keep clean, and
is sometimes a great source of pride and status. |
X In earlier times
the word stove referred to a number of different utensils,
considerably smaller and more modest in size and scope, and usually
portable. It was not found in every home, and did not bear the
responsibility for daily meal preparation. It was, instead, a rather
luxurious tool associated with more privileged cookery.
In fact the word
was applied to a number of different cooking tools.
First there was the
stove that suggested a small chamber which held glowing coals and served as
a low temperature drying oven. Candied fruits and vegetables (comfits,
suckets, and sweetmeats) were sometimes set inside this chamber to
complete
their drying off. Illustration: E. Smith [London, 1758] offered instructions
"To Candy Orange Flowers," in which the flowers are boiled,
candied in syrup, and then "set in a stove [italics mine], or in
the sun, and when they begin to candy take them out, and lay them on glasses
to dry." The stove heat, apparently comparable to England’s sunshine,
was not easily sustained on the hearth.
Mrs. Smith was not
the first: Predating her cookbook by some hundred years, a private recipe
collection included directions for preserving algelica stalks, describing
its use: "Lay them on plates, & set them in a stove, in which put a
chafing dish of coles [coals] twice a day, till they be dry." This kind
of stove sounds more like an oven. It must have been large enough to contain
both the heat source and the angelica stalks with enough distance between
them so as not to overheat or burn the food. Seventeenth-century candying
recipes often suggested that the final drying be done in a warm oven
"after the bread is drawn, till they be dry and well candied." The
"stove" had several advantages, among them that one did not have
to work around the bread-baking schedule, but one did have to own the thing.
The status of candied foods was based not only on the high cost of the sugar
but also its requisite equipment. Incidentally, this stove had the added
advantage of being used at waist height on a tabletop or special stand, was
convenient and easily supervised.
And then there was
the small portable stove often associated with the military of the American
War of Independence. It was basically a hinged grate suspended
over a rack
for coals, sitting on penny feet, an open footed cube with a wooden handle
and only about 8 inches in each dimension. Such stoves were hand-forged, and
probably not limited to the battlefield. Nor were they enclosed chambers,
but rather portable burners, very likely adapted from the built-in stew
stoves long-since known and used both in Europe and the colonies. They had
the advantage of portability, as well as small, relatively cook fires so
valuable in candying.
The word stove
then had a variable history complete with confusing and flexible
applications to a number of kinds of cooking apparatus that were sometimes
tabletop and other times oven. And, apart from the subject of cooking
stoves, the word came to signify the heating stove, the precursor to central
heating. That’s another story.
The fantastic large
cook stoves were not new to the nineteenth century, despite their great
development and general use in that period. The early Puritans had known
bank or box stoves in Holland, where they had already been in use for over
one hundred years. Illustrations in early European cookbooks suggest that
they were in use far longer. At first of masonry construction, they were
like table-tops, the fire below feeding individual grated openings upon
which one set the pots or a small spitted roast. Needless to say these were
not to be found in ordinary homes, but rather in the kitchens of those with
means, and were often presided over by professional cooks. Sometimes these
evolved into what became known as stew stoves of various sizes, sometimes so
large that the large open cauldron was built into a masonry base and heated
by its own firebox below. Such stew stoves were common in the
almost-institutional kitchens that fed large numbers daily, as in the courts
of Europe or the communal kitchens of the American Shakers, where they
produced mammoth stews and soups.
The growing
production of smelted and cast iron in Europe encouraged the evolution of
stew stoves into cast-iron plate stoves. The first foundry in the American
colonies, the Saugus blast furnace (1645) smelted bog iron with charcoal and
cast "pots..., mortars, stoves, and skillets," although
it is unclear whether they were for heating or cooking.
However, before
1750 box stoves were made and used. In the colonies they were expensive
compared with those of Europe. German immigrants were sometimes
advised to
bring their own stoves with them, an easy enough thing to do as they were
made of interlocking plates, sometimes bolted, and easily broken down and
reassembled. At first simple five-plate ovens with adjacent fire boxes, they
were expanded inventively to become the dominating centerpiece of the
Victorian kitchen. Often constructed with two or more ovens and six or eight
removable lids, it was possible to set one’s pots anywhere on the stove
top, to slide them from one end to the other to achieve the necessary
temperature. A system of dampers and flues controlled the fire in the
firebox and consequently the stove top and oven—the successful cook
trained herself to a constant routine of heat checks and fuel and air flow
adjustments.
By the turn of the
century electricity and soon gas were to supplant wood and coal, eliminating
the need for chimneys and stove pipes. Modern stoves are available in
choices that seem unrelated to the early cooking devices of the same name.
Yet one sometimes finds an old-fashioned bank stove used in a fine
restaurant, or an Aga cooker that uses the same principle; and more than
nostalgic cook dreams of the kitchen that will hold a working Victorian
cookstove.
|
The following two
recipes are taken from W.M., The Compleat Cook And A Queen’s Delight
(London, 1655), facsimile edition by Prospect Books, London: 1984. They are offered
with reenactors in mind, or perhaps those interested in period banquets.
They are simple enough to adapt to a modern stove, and the results are worth
it.
|
|
To dry any Fruits
after they are preserved, or to Candy them
The preserving
referred to requires that the fruit be pared, cored, and sliced (not too
small) and simmered slowly in a syrup made of 2 parts sugar and 1 part
water. Some early recipes suggest, instead, that you mix the prepared fruit
with equal weight of sugar, let it sit overnight in a cool place, and then
(adding no additional liquid) bring the fruit and its sugary liquid to a
boil and simmer until the fruit is translucent. This usually takes an hour
or two, depending on the fruit.
|
|
Take Pippins, Pears
or Plums, and wash them out in warm water from the syrup they are preserved
in, strew them over with searsed (strained) Sugar, as you would do flower
[flour] upon fish to fry them; set them in a broad earthen Pan, that they
may lie one by one; then set them in a warm Oven or Stove to dry. If you
will candy them withall, you must strew on Sugar three or four times in the
drying.
|
|
To Make clear Cakes
of Plums
The following kind
of sweetmeat is far more demanding, but enticing nevertheless. With a
kitchen stove that can maintain low temperatures (150 –175 degrees), the
work is considerably simplified.
|
|
Take Plums of any
sorts, Raspiss are the best, put them in a stone Jug (stoneware crock), into
a pot of seething [boiling]water, and when they are dissolved, strain them
together through a fair cloth, and take to a pint of that a pound of sugar,
put to as much color [heat?] as will melt it, and boil to a Candy height
[220 degrees], boil the liquor likewise in another Posnet, then put them
seething hot together, and so boil a little while stirring them together,
then put them in glasses, and set them in an Oven or Stove in a drying heat,
let them stand so two or three weeks, and never be cold, removing them from
one warm place to another, they will turn in a week; beware you set them not
too hot, for they will be tough; so every day turn them till they be dry;
they will be very clear.
|
|
To Candy Angelico
Stalks
The following
recipe is taken from Martha Washington’s Booke of Cookery, [ca.
1625] edited by Karen Hess, New York: Columbia University, 1981. If you are
one of the few lucky ones with access to angelica or have it in your garden,
here’s the way to make it usable.
|
|
About a weeke in
aprill [in England, remember], take of ye [off the]stalks of angelico, &
boyle them in faire water till they be tender. then pill ye thin scin off
them [pull the
thin skin off them]
& squees them betwixt 2 plates till all ye water be out. then brayd them
If you like it, & boyle them to A candy [height, 220 degrees] in sugar
as other roots be done. then dry them in a stove.
|
|